Friday, August 14, 2015

Closing Reflection- As I Gaze into the Glassy Water- Jordan Zapp 8/14/15

As I Gaze into the Glassy Water

            Hello, reader.  I just wanted to sincerely thank you for reading through my portfolio.  It is really a special thing to experience the journey of growth as a writer, and I am glad that I can share it.  Writing, for me, has always been more about self-reflection, whether one is writing a literary analysis, research paper, or poem. I hope each piece reflects my deep passion for language, love of prose, and admiration for the process of delving deeper into the ocean of hidden meanings and themes in writing.  So thank you for allowing me to do something I love; thank you for giving it your time and attention.  I hope you enjoy this final reflection. 
            My favorite piece in this portfolio is the literary analysis in Two Lorries. I love to analyze poems because I think it is really amazing to find hidden meanings and interpret metaphors; it is like experiencing the soul of the writer.  For example, a theme in the poem Two Lorries, written by Seamus Heaney, is ashes.  The narrator mentions ashes seven times through the course of the piece.  I really liked picking apart the significance of ashes.  Do they symbolize destruction, the paradox of joy and sadness needing each other? Hope? Beauty? The memory of what once was?  This was my favorite piece to write because it is an emotionally riveting poem; it is engaging because it is so curiously vivid and descriptive. 
            This also made it the hardest piece to write. Part of me didn’t want to analyze it.  Firstly, I didn’t think any commentary that I made on it would do it any justice.  Secondly, I felt like analyzing it was like asking a painter to describe his artwork.  It might take away from the sincere, standing beauty of it.  Basically, you just have to read the poem and let it wash over you like profound yet peaceful waves.  When I sat down to write about it, I wasn’t sure where to start.  It took several hours for me to organize my thoughts, trying to make what I was trying to say evident and straightforward.
            In the opening piece, I stated that my goals were as follows: 1) Learn how to use commas correctly.  I think I really did improve upon this.  I began to use semicolons instead and I often caught and corrected myself when revising.  My second goal was becoming more organized.  This was the hardest goal to achieve. I had to force myself to pre write; a step I would gleefully skip over.  I think this reflected in my writing because it became fluidly organized and easier to follow.  My final goal was to become more creative with my writing.  This year, I became more comfotable with writing, to the point where I really wasn’t afraid to be creative.  For example, doing analysis in the form of a letter was really fun.  It allowed me to write from a different perspective and ultimately allowed me to grow as a writer. 

            Although this course was seemingly short, the amount that I have learned about myself exceeds far beyond what I thought possible.  There were times when I was working on assignments late into the night and into the morning.  There is a special kind of self-discovery that comes with experiencing your writing at three-a.m.  This summer, I learned that I love old writers; I love the classics because there is something so timeless about them that you cannot believe a human wrote them.  Writing is a testament to human creativity, understanding, imagination, and ability to analyze the world.  It is an ocean of ideas, swelling and crashing and spraying its essence into the minds of writers, artists, and thinkers. I hope that my skinny river of writing will make its way into that sea of significance someday.

Writer's Choice- Letter to Shakespeare- Jordan Zapp 7/17/15

William Shakespeare
1234 Literary Lane
Stratford-upon-Avon, England

Dear Shakespeare,

            You’re kind of a genius.  When you consider all of your accomplishments as a writer, the variety in your work, it’s a wonder it all comes from one person.  The Renaissance, being a time of rebirth and a wave of new culture, showcased numerous up-and-coming writers, artists, and thinkers.  You are one of the ones who managed to embody that rebirth and introduction of new ideas.    Your work has been studied for centuries, picked apart and put back together so many times you’d think they were puzzles.  I guess in some ways, they actually are.   Your poetry and drama is still important today because is has influenced so many other poets and writers.  We still put on your plays and look for new meanings between the lines.  So congratulations, you are famous.
I think what gives your plays their lasting significance is that we can still relate to so many of the characters and themes presented within them.  In your most famous play, Hamlet, we find the main character endlessly fascinating because his innermost struggles are present because he is human.  Being human is something we can all identify with (obviously).  The joys and trials of being a human are demonstrated throughout your piece; love, betrayal, madness, anger, revenge, mortality, and inner conflict.   It exemplifies humanism, a huge cultural movement in the Renaissance.   
            Not only is the poetry beautiful in itself, but the characters are the most incredible; they are well-developed and thought out.  I like how in Hamlet, each character is a foil to Hamlet.  For example, Fortinbras is a man of action while Hamlet is a man of thought.  Ultimately the question becomes, is Hamlet still a hero even though he does not take much action?  Anther interesting character comparison is that of Hamlet and Ophelia; emotional strength to emotional weakness.  I think Ophelia’s best moments come when she loses Hamlet and her father.  When she starts to sing and hand out flowers to Claudius and Gertrude, it is her first real demonstration of independent action.  There is no influence from her father or from Hamlet.   This first show of independence relates to anyone trying to break from overbearing influence. 
            Hamlet is also relatable because he has so many dimensions to his personality.   He is somber and reflective, clever, brutally honest, enraged, depressed and then despondent; in other words, he is constantly changing.  He learns things, comes to terms with hardship, and seems to have changed.  Relating back to being human, he ultimately becomes enraged again.  Were you trying to say that, despite our best efforts, we cannot change enough to avoid submitting to our human desires?  Hamlet chides his mother and Ophelia for being “weak” and always succumbing to human desires, and he ultimately does too.  Are some human desires more honorable than others?  Why?  Aren’t they all acts of passion?
I wish you could answer all of these questions.  Don’t pull an old King Hamlet on me and show up outside my window though, that would be weird.  Anyway, your work has inspired writers for centuries, exemplifying an era and influencing others. 



Sincerely,



Jordan Zapp

Student writer

Composition- Two Lorries- Jordan Zapp 8/13/15



Two Lorries

            The modern era was marked by new ideas in many fields, most notably literature. With this new era came new dangers.  War had laid waste across that world, people were scared, confused, and in need of help.  These themes inspired new sources of inspiration for writers, and new elements emerged that would define modernism.  In the poem Two Lorries by Irish poet Seamus Heaney, we can identify these elements.   Two Lorries exemplifies the modern era with its use of fragmentation, themes of loss, and destruction.
            Fragmentation was a popular literary theme in the modern period.  It symbolized the destruction occurring at the time using broken stanzas and lines.  The use of fragmentation in Two Lorries is evident.  There are many instances where the phrase is not a full sentence or completed thought. The lines drop off suddenly in strange places that may symbolize the sudden collapse of culture.  For example, one stanza ends in, “Empty upon empty, in a flurry,” and the next one begins with, “Of motes and engine-revs, but which lorry,” (Heaney).   The stanzas seem to have holes in between them like a Jenga game, teetering and threatening to fall over..  Additionally, the author mulls over two lorries, the cheerful one and the deadly one.  This reflects the constant presence of the joy rising from the ashes of war and the bombs that buried them.
            During the Modern era, two major world wars occurred. Many families sent their men overseas to aid in the bloody battles while those at home made other sacrifices.  Loss is a huge element of modern literature, reflecting the loss of loved ones, homes, and personal freedoms.  In this case, the author has lost his mother and his town, Magherafelt. The poem begins with him almost cheerfully describing a moment as a boy; his mother flirting with a kind coalman.  He then describes a horrific dream in which his mother emerges from the bombed town carrying ashes. “Death walked out past her like a dust-faced coalman,” describes the reality of death and its suddenness, its concealment.  The theme of loss is heavily present in Two Lorries, just as it was in the Modern era.
            Ashes.  The word brings to mind fire, burning heat, blackness floating lazily through the air, settling with the dust.  In other words, ashes do not exist without destruction.  Ironically, the making of ashes is necessary for one’s survival.  Heaney first describes the coalman and the prominence of ashes in his everyday life,  “all business round her stove, half wiping ashes with a backhand from her cheek…” (Heaney).   Ashes come to mean something else: utter destruction.   Magherafelt is bombed, leaving the town in a pile of ashes.  The narrator has a dream of his mother, “her shopping bags full of shoveled ashes,” as she sits with Death.  By the end of the poem, the ashes come to symbolize ghosts, “then reappear from your lorry as my mother’s dreamboat coalman filmed in silk-white ashes.”  Maybe the ashes symbolize everything; destruction and beauty and hope all in one.  Maybe that is what the modern/postmodern period was all about; finding the hope in a pile of ashes. 
            Two Lorries was one of my favorite pieces that we read all year.  It truly came to exemplify the spirit of an era and culture.  I think is epitomizes the spirit of humanity in that we can find and make beauty in even the darkest of times.  The use of fragmentation shows the theme of being in pieces, as many cities and spirits were at the time.   So much was lost to the bloody fight for peace, as the theme of loss reflects.  Finally, the theme of destruction, symbolized as ashes, ties the modern style together



Works Cited




Heaney, Seamus. "Two Lorries." Poetry Archive. Web. 13 Aug. 2015.

Research Paper- No Moooore Factory Farming- Jordan Zapp 8/12/15

No Moooore Factory Farming
            Mass-producing animals and animal products has been part of our culture for the last century. It has grown significantly up to modern day, emerging as one of the biggest, most powerful industries. This mass-production is known as factory farming. It looks like how it sounds: cows, pigs, and poultry kept in cages or stalls, machinery doing most of the dirty work, factory-style. The practice of factory farming is detrimental to the planet due to the way it negatively affects our health, ethics, and the environment.
            “Food is fuel,” “you are what you eat,” “let thy food by thy medicine.” We have heard it all before. What we put in our body affects our daily function indefinitely. It appears that the factory farming industry did not get the memo. Many farmers give their animals low doses of antibiotics and hormones. These are given in order to promote growth, aid production, and prevent disease (Factory Farming: Misery for Animals). Not only are these antibiotics and hormones doing unnatural things to the animals, but it also affects whoever eats the animals as well. Eating animals that have been inundated with hormones can lead to chronic illness, obesity, heart disease, and abnormal or early developmental growth in young teens. According to an article by nutrition expert Tracey Roizman, eating animals with hormone residue puts women at risk to develop potentially cancerous breast lumps. In another study, a chemical growth promoter known as zeranol was found to have reduced height and breast size in adolescent girls (Roizman). Clearly, the use of hormones in animals will affect the humans who consume them.  What’s more, bacteria residing on or near the animals become exposed to the antibiotics and can develop antibody resistance (Factory Farming: Misery for Animals). This will also affect us because the next time you are sick, your antibiotic may no longer be effective.  Our bodies do not need the health problems associated with hormone treated livestock.   
            Like humans, animals produce waste. Thousands of animals in one farm, times the thousands of factory farms across the world is a recipe for a whole lot of waste. Where does it all go? Good question. Most farms want to get rid of the excrement quickly and cheaply. It ends up dumped in lagoons, liquefied, and sprayed on to the land. The waste leaks into the water sources and soil of neighboring farms. Studies have been done proving that the toxins in the waste can cause illnesses to people near or on the farm. These problems can include neurological, respiratory, and reproductive problems (Other Health Risks of the Meat Industry).  Additionally, an article by the EPA reveals that large amounts of nitrate from waste, which seeps into underground sources of drinking water, can affect children with an often fatal blood disease known as Blue Baby Syndrome (What’s the Problem?).  The factory farming industry is mismanaging the animal waste at the expense of our health.  Poop is making us sick! Frankly, that is really gross.
            During the processing phase of factory farming, meat is sterilized and cleaned so that it can be neatly packaged and sent to a grocery store and from there, to your dinner table. Unfortunately, not all things can be cleaned from the meat.  Scientists discovered a disease in the 1970s in cattle known as Mad Cow Disease (Food Safety Consequences of Factory Farms).  It is an infectious disease that affects the brain of the cattle.  Mad Cow Disease was a direct result of cattle being fed cattle products, such as unused organs and brain tissue. This infectious disease cannot be “taken out” of animal meat even after processing.  In fact, a “human” version known as variant Creutzfelt Jakob Disease (vCJD) is believed to be caused by exposure to contaminated meat (Mad Cow Disease).  To put it simply, what we are feeding the animals affects them and therefore, affects us.
            Imagine living in a cramped, dirty, smelly stall with hundreds of other humans pressed against you; that is how it has been your whole life. No personal space, no freedom whatsoever. That is reality for factory-farmed animals. These animals will go their entire lives in filthy, dark sheds, stuffed into battery cages, and crates. They will never raise families, never build nests or experience what they are supposed to as animals (Factory Farming: Misery for Animals). Take chickens, for example. A chicken will be stuffed into a small battery cage with several other chickens. Several other battery cages will be stacked on top of them. Animals above will defecate on animals below, spreading disease. Some chickens will die and not be properly disposed of (Factory Farming: Misery for Animals). It is chaoic, grimy, putrid uproar. No living thing deserves a life like that, yet that is what they get. There have been few laws set in place to protect the animals from damaging environments. On of them is the Humane Slaughter Act. Approved in 1958, it contains outdated standards and excludes poultry.  How can this act remain the same when our world has changed so much in the last fifty years?
            In addition to unpleasant living conditions, animals are also subject to cruel slaughter methods. The Humane Slaughter Act applies to millions of livestock killed on federal slaughter plants. It does not apply to the billions of chickens, millions of turkeys, ducks, and rabbits killed each year. It does not apply to animals killed on the factory farm (Cruel Slaughter Practices). The regulated methods of “humane” slaughter are expensive and rarely used. The chicken industry is known to grind male chicks alive because there is no other use for them. Because they are not protected, they are subject to horrors such as “being hung upside down, shocked into paralysis, having their throat cut, and being drowned in hot water- all while conscious,” (At Slaughter).  No living thing should ever have to undergo such barbarity at the hands of a human.
            Not only is the treatment of the animals unethical, but the business aspect of the industry itself is questionable. Factory farming is a huge industry, and billions of dollars invested in it. According to the Center of Concern, an oligopoly is usually four major firms controlling over 40% of the market. The agricultural (including factory farming) industries are closer to 60-80%. Our food industry is being controlled by a handful of firms, getting rich of cheap farming practices at the animals’ expense. They often choose the path of least resistance, keeping production cheap. The success of the industry, supported the consumers who love meat, enable lobbyists to shape farming policy in favor of big business. There have been changes in regulation that have made it easier to “sneak by” with cheaper, unethical practices (Why Corporate Agriculture is a Problem). This prevents good economic competition, discourages small family farms, and jeopardizes the integrity of the industry.
            Factory farming is also damaging to the environment. Lots of animals produce lots and lots of waste. These huge amounts of manure release methane and other greenhouse gasses such as nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to the global warming crisis. According to report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), animal agriculture gets credit for 37% of methane emissions and 65% of nitrous oxide emissions (How Factory Farming Contributes to Global Warming). Our world is deteriorating quickly as we will are clogging up our atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.  Imagine the improvements if factory farming emissions were out of the equation!
            The waste and general production also pollute the air, water and land. Excrement is normally disposed of in lagoons or lakes and does not undergo the sanitizing process of human waste (Factory Farms and the Environment). After it has liquefied, waste is usually sprayed onto the land. The manure seeps into the water supply, the soil, and toxins rise into the air. This can affect our health, as aforementioned. The contaminated soil contains crops that we need to eat; the polluted water is no longer safe to drink.
            Lastly, factory farming contributes to deforestation. Vast areas of land are cleared to raise livestock and are eventually exhausted from waste production and constant tread from animals. What’s more, large amounts of land are cleared to grow food for the livestock (Factory Farms and the Environment). With regard to eliminating factory farming, many argue that we will exhaust the land even more because we will need to grow more crops. This is not entirely accurate; we will in fact be relieving much of the land from the constant growing of crops for the animals. Not only are trees being cut down and ecosystems destroyed, but no counter measures are being taken to replant or relocate. This results not only in elimination of natural resources, but also decreases the amount of fresh air to balance emissions.
            Factory farming causes severe damage to the planet. If we want our bodies to last long enough to live good, healthy lives, we cannot expect it to thrive with the aid of toxic hormones, animal waste, or infectious diseases.  In the same way, we cannot claim to be the compassionate, intelligent beings when considering the way animals are treated before and during slaughter.  Finally, factory farming is killing the environment, the earth; our only home.  It is unsustainable and unhealthy for the health of humans, the well-being of animals, and the condition of the earth.

Works Cited


"At Slaughter." Animal Welfare Institute. Animal Welfare Institute. Web. 12 Aug. 2015. 
"Cruel Slaughter Practices : The Humane Society of the United States." The Humane Society. Web.                12 Aug. 2015.

"Factory Farms and the Environment." Farm Sanctuary. Web. 18 July 2015

"Factory Farming: Misery for Animals." PETA. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.                        Web. 18 July 2015.

"Food Safety Consequences of Factory Farms." Food Water Watch General. 27 Mar.       2007.                      Web. 29 July 2015.

"How Factory Farming Contributes to Global Warming." EcoWatch. 21 Jan. 2013. Web.   2 Aug.             2015.

"Mad Cow Disease in Humans: Facts, Treatment and Symptoms." MedicineNet.

 "Other Health Risks of the Meat Industry." People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. PETA,             n.d. Web. 29 July 2015. 

Roizman, Tracey. "Do Hormones in the Food Supply Affect the Human Body?" Healthy                                 Eating. Web. 12 Aug. 2015

"What's the Problem?" EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, 4 Aug. 2015. Web. 12      Aug.                        2015.   

"Why Corporate Agriculture Is a Problem." Center of Concern. CEDC. Web. 29 July        2015.